Your Basket is currently empty

Your Bookshelf is empty!

Your Basket is currently empty


Debating Autonomy

By: Imogen Goold, Jonathan Herring
Media of Debating Autonomy
See larger image
Published: 11-06-2020
Format: PDF eBook (?)
Edition: 1st
Extent: 128
ISBN: 9781509915699
Imprint: Hart Publishing
Series: Debating Law
RRP: £21.58
Online price : £19.42
Save £2.16 (10%)


Buying pre-order items

Your pre-order item will usually be shipped on the publishing date of the book.


You will receive an email with a download link for the ebook on the publication date.


You will not be charged for pre-ordered books until they are available to be shipped. Pre-ordered ebooks will not be charged for until they are available for download.

Amending or cancelling your order

For orders that have not been shipped you can usually make changes to pre-orders up to 24 hours before the publishing date.

Request Inspection Copy   (?)
Once you have successfully made your inspection-copy request, you will receive a confirmation email explaining that your request is awaiting approval. On approval, you will either be sent the print copy of the book, or you will receive a further email containing the link to allow you to download your eBook.

This book is also available in other formats: View formats

Please note that ebooks are subject to tax and the final price may vary depending on your country of residence.

Delivery & Returns

Tell others about this product

Loren Epson

About Debating Autonomy

Who is best placed in medical decision-making, to decide: the patient or the doctor? In this important new volume in the Debating Law series, Imogen Goold argues that the law should strongly support individual choice and autonomy. Medical decisions, she argues, are deeply personal, with life-changing consequences, and it must be for the patient to make them. Even in the event of those decisions ultimately harming the patient, fully informed, autonomous decisions by the patient must be supported by the law. Jonathan Herring counters, arguing that placing the an overriding emphasis on personal autonomy does not always achieve the best outcome for the patient. He argues instead that in certain circumstances, best interest considerations must take precedence over autonomous decision-making. He suggests that the law does not support autonomy as is commonly claimed, but instead takes a much more nuanced approach, balancing the principle of autonomy against other principles and considerations.

Bookmark and Share