Your Basket is currently empty

Your Bookshelf is empty!

Your Basket is currently empty


Human Rights Acts

The Mechanisms Compared

By: Kris Gledhill
Media of Human Rights Acts
See larger image
Published: 28-05-2015
Format: PDF eBook (?)
Edition: 1st
Extent: 592
ISBN: 9781782258049
Imprint: Hart Publishing
RRP: £46.42
Online price : £41.78
Save £4.64 (10%)

Request Inspection Copy   (?)
Once you have successfully made your inspection-copy request, you will receive a confirmation email explaining that your request is awaiting approval. On approval, you will either be sent the print copy of the book, or you will receive a further email containing the link to allow you to download your eBook.

This book is also available in other formats: View formats

Please note that ebooks are subject to tax and the final price may vary depending on your country of residence.

Delivery & Returns

Tell others about this product

Loren Epson

About Human Rights Acts

There are now a number of statutes in different parts of the world that offer non-constitutional protection for human rights through mechanisms such as strong interpretive obligations, quasi-tort actions and obligations on legislatures to consider whether statutes are felt to breach human rights obligations. They exist in New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria.

The aim of this book is to consider the jurisprudence that has developed in these various jurisdictions relating to these mechanics for the promotion of human rights; relevant case law from countries such as Canada, South Africa and the United States that have a supreme law constitutional approach is also featured. Chapters cover such matters as the choice between a supreme law and non-supreme law bill of rights, the different approaches adopted as to how legislators are alerted to possible breaches of fundamental rights as Bills progress, the extent of the interpretive obligation, the consequences of failing to reach a rights-compliant interpretation, and the remedies available in litigation.

The book is aimed at practitioners and also at academics and policy makers.

'… Kris Gledhill addresses for the first time, and in some considerable detail, the dynamics operating within different common law systems that seek to integrate international fundamental rights obligations into domestic law . . . The strength of this book is to explore apparent antitheses . . . with intellectual depth so that the relationship between human rights law on the international level and human rights law on the domestic level becomes clearer and comes to be seen not so much as a sharp legal dichotomy but, rather, as the fashioning of mechanisms . . . to integrate international and domestic fundamental rights regimes so that they work harmoniously.' From the Foreword by Richard Gordon QC, Brick Court Chambers

'Gledhill's study bridges the gap between the promise of international human rights commitments and the protection afforded those rights by statutory bills of rights, a model that has been adopted in countries such as New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, and Australia. It is an invaluable resource.'
Grant Huscroft, Western University Faculty of Law

Table Of Contents

1. Introduction: Aims and Outline
2. The Obligation to Secure Internationally Recognised Human Rights
3. The Pre-Existing Protection of Human Rights
4. The Desire to Move Further
5. Working Out the Content of Rights
6. Pre-Enactment Scrutiny
7. The Duty to Respect Rights
8. Interpretive Obligation
9. Litigation and Complaint Procedures
10. Remedies
11. Summaries and Conclusions


“Kris Gledhill's book Human Rights Acts: The Mechanisms Compared is a magisterial work of scholarship, and would interest human rights lawyers and public lawyers, scholars and students.” –  Gabriella Raetz and Patrick Keyzer, Public Law Review

“Over 10 substantive chapters Gledhill demonstrates a mastery of the subject matter, providing practitioners, students and researchers with an essential guide to the application of statutory, "non-entrenched", human rights instruments.” –  Michael Ramsden, Law Quarterly Review

Bookmark and Share