Your Basket is currently empty

Your Bookshelf is empty!

Your Basket is currently empty


Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada

The Newest Despotism?

By: Janina Boughey
Media of Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada
See larger image
Published: 31-10-2019
Format: Paperback
Edition: 1st
Extent: 320
ISBN: 9781509933105
Imprint: Hart Publishing
Series: Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law
Dimensions: 244 x 169 mm
RRP: £40.00
Online price : £36.00
Save £4.00 (10%)

: 14 -21 days

This book is also available in other formats: View formats

Delivery & Returns

Tell others about this product

Loren Epson

About Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada

It is commonly asserted that bills of rights have had a 'righting' effect on the principles of judicial review of administrative action and have been a key driver of the modern expansion in judicial oversight of the executive arm of government. A number of commentators have pointed to Australian administrative law as evidence for this 'righting' hypothesis. They have suggested that the fact that Australia is an outlier among common law jurisdictions in having neither a statutory nor a constitutional framework to expressly protect human rights explains why Australia alone continues to take an apparently 'formalist', 'legalist' and 'conservative' approach to administrative law. Other commentators and judges, including a number in Canada, have argued the opposite: that bills of rights have the effect of stifling the development of the common law. However, for the most part, all these claims remain just that – there has been limited detailed analysis of the issue, and no detailed comparative analysis of the veracity of the claims. This book analyses in detail the interaction between administrative and human rights law in Australia and Canada, arguing that both jurisdictions have reached remarkably similar positions regarding the balance between judicial and executive power, and between broader fundamental principles including the rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty and the separation of powers. It will provide valuable reading for all those researching judicial review and human rights.

Table Of Contents

1. Introduction
I. The 'Righting' of Administrative Law?
II. This Book's Contribution
III. A Note on Methodology
IV. The Scope of this Book
V. The Structure of this Book

Part I: Constitutional and Statutory Frameworks
2. The Framework for Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Australia
I. Australia's Constitution
II. The Constitutional Status of Judicial Review
III. Statutory Judicial Review Frameworks
IV. Australia's Human Rights Framework
V. Conclusions
3. The Framework for Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Canada
I. Canada's Constitution
II. The Constitutional Status of Judicial Review
III. Privative Clauses and the Standard of Review
IV. Statutory Judicial Review Frameworks
V. Canada's Human Rights Framework
VI. Conclusions

Part II: The Effects of Canada's Rights Framework on Judicial Review
4. Procedural Fairness
I. Overview of Rights to Fairness
II. The Scope of the Common Law Duty to Afford Procedural Fairness
III. The Content of Fairness
IV. The Rationales for Fairness
V. Litigants' Use of Fairness
VI. Entrenchment of Procedural Fairness
VII. Conclusions
5. Controlling Discretion
I. A Brief History of Judicial Attitudes Towards Discretion
II. Controlling Discretion in Australia
III. Controlling Discretion in Canada
IV. Human Rights Controls on Discretion
V. Conclusions
6. Intensity of Review
I. Intensity Under the Classic Model
II. Intensity of Review in Australia
III. Intensity of Review in Canada
IV. Conclusions
7. Conclusions


“The text is aimed at graduate students and scholars interested in comparative studies of judicial review, human rights, and public law. As such, it would be a valuable acquisition for law libraries and scholarly collections on judicial review.” –  Silvia Dimitrova and Francisca Sotelo, Canadian Law Library Review

Bookmark and Share